CODEX ALPE ADRIA 2006 results fetched from http://0xaa.org/2006/productions/ 2006 Edition Demoscene Productions Codex Alpe Adria 2006 is taking take place From June 30 to July 2nd, 2006. The following is a very rough and preliminary set of data. This section will be updated with final results and downloadable productions during the week after the event. Votes 24 voters expressed their preference as follows: A>F>D>G>C>B>H>I>E>J C>A>F>B>D>G>I>J>E>H C>F>G>D>B>E>A>I>J>H C>I>J>F>H>G>E>D>B>A D>C>F>I>J>H>G>A>B>E D>G>I>J>A>B>E>H>C>F E>G>C>F>A>B>D>H>I>J F>B>A>D>C>E>J>I>H>G F>C>B>A>J>G>D>H>E>I F>E>G>B>C>D>A>H>I>J F>G>B>C>D>A>E>J>I>H F>G>C>A>H>B>D>E>I>J F>G>E>C>A>B>H>J>I>D G>E>C>F>A>H>B>J>D>I G>F>B>E>C>A>D>I>H>J G>F>B>I>C>D>A>E>J>H G>F>C>A>E>B>D>I>J>H G>F>C>B>A>E>I>D>H>J G>F>D>E>C>A>I>B>H>J G>F>E>C>D>B>A>H>J>I G>F>E>C>D>B>A>I>H>J C>A>D>B (omitted 6 candidates) D>H>J>A>B>C>F>J>I>E (double J, omitted G) F>E>C>G>B>J>A>D>B>I (double B, omitted H) Reading the Votes Each line represents a voting sheet (ballot). Votes are ranked by preference. For example, 13 voters said that they preferred F (Bike 64 Project) over G (Minimig: an Amiga in an FPGA), while 10 voters said that they considered G better than F, and one voter expressed no preference on F vs. G. Counting Because the Schulze method was used for the first time at this event (or at any such event, from what we know), we relied on expert consultation to handle the special cases (omissions and duplicates): * Omissions are automatically grouped at the bottom of the list by the counting software * When a voter expresses a multiple ranking for the same candidate, all instances of the repeated candidate are removed (instead of arbitrarily removing one of the duplicates, or excluding the entire ballot) In general we followed the rule that when a voter's vote is ambiguous, the voter's intent is taken into account to the maximum extent possible. If you would like, you can repeat the counting with any software or web service that supports the Schulze method (also known as Beatpath winner). If the software does not support the creation of a ranked list (but only gives a single winner) simply choose one winner at a time, then eliminate that candidate from the ballots, and repeat the process until you have a complete ranked list. Combined Results The combined demo competition results are as follows: 1. (F) Bike 64 Project, by Daniele Redivo (Wild) 2. (G) Minimig: an Amiga in an FPGA, by Dennis van Weeren (Wild) 3. (C) Stars and Stabbers, by K2 (C64 4K Intro) 4. (A) Wish We Were in Italy, by Barry Blitter, Slummy & Dominei (Amiga Demo) 5. (B) Spacekitten, by RNO (Amiga Demo) 6. (D) A Study on Volume Behaviour in Limited Time and Space by James Tonic/Limp Ninja (PC Demo) 7. (E) 0xAA 2006 T-Shirt, by Takeo Sato (Wild) 8. (I) Catch Me If You Can, by James Tonic (Music) 9. (H) Dogma Crescendo, by Ps (Graphics) 10. (J) Spita, by Soolta (Music) Results by Category Amiga 1. Wish We Were in Italy, by Barry Blitter, Slummy & Dominei (Demo) 2. Spacekitten, by RNO (Demo) C64 1. Stars and Stabbers, by K2 (4K Intro) PC 1. A Study on Volume Behaviour in Limited Time and Space by James Tonic/Limp Ninja (Demo) Wild 1. Bike 64 Project, by Daniele Redivo 2. Minimig: an Amiga in an FPGA, by Dennis van Weeren 3. 0xAA 2006 T-Shirt, by Takeo Sato Graphics 1. Dogma Crescendo, by Ps Music 1. Catch Me If You Can, by James Tonic 2. Spita, by Soolta